<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">

    <channel>


	<title>For Faith &amp; Family | Some common sense in the &#8220;mommy wars&#8221; | Comments</title>
    <link>http://faithandfamily.com/</link>
    <description>This feed provides all comments on &quot;Some common sense in the &#8220;mommy wars&#8221;.&quot;</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <webMaster>web&#45;master@erlc.com</webMaster>
    <copyright>&#x2117; &amp; &#xA9; 2008 ERLC</copyright>
   

		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 07:43:08 CST</pubDate>
		
    <item>
      	<title>Comment 1</title>
      	<link>http://faithandfamily.com/fff/article/some&#45;common&#45;sense&#45;in&#45;the&#45;mommy&#45;wars#comment1</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://faithandfamily.com/fff/article/some&#45;common&#45;sense&#45;in&#45;the&#45;mommy&#45;wars#comment1</guid>
      	<description><![CDATA[<p>While Mrs. Friedan seemed harsh in using the word &#8220;parasite&#8221;, I understand the point she was trying to make, and that no personal insult was intended. In economic theory, a parasite is a person/entity that benefits from something w/o contributing back to it. From an economic standpoint, homemakers&#8217; efforts don&#8217;t make a contribution to the nation. I know about the studies on how many billions of $$ in unpaid work they do, but the catch is: this work doesn&#8217;t enter the larger scheme of things. It benefits their own families, but that&#8217;s where it stops.
<br />
   I think that while homemaking should be an available life choice, those who choose to be homemakers should be not supported by national resources, because they don&#8217;t contribute back to the welfare and security of the public, or the workings of the gov&#8217;t. If stay-at-home Mom needs to go to a doctor or dentist, for example, then Dad or other working family members--NOT a dear old uncle by the name of Sam--should pick up the tab.
</p>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 07:43:08 CST</pubDate>
    </item>

    
    </channel>
</rss>