<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">

    <channel>


	<title>For Faith &amp; Family | Equal Rights and Responsibilities? | Comments</title>
    <link>http://faithandfamily.com/</link>
    <description>This feed provides all comments on &quot;Equal Rights and Responsibilities?.&quot;</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <webMaster>web&#45;master@erlc.com</webMaster>
    <copyright>&#x2117; &amp; &#xA9; 2008 ERLC</copyright>
   

		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 10:46:57 CST</pubDate>
		
    <item>
      	<title>Comment 1</title>
      	<link>http://faithandfamily.com/fff/article/equal&#45;rights&#45;and&#45;responsibilities#comment1</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://faithandfamily.com/fff/article/equal&#45;rights&#45;and&#45;responsibilities#comment1</guid>
      	<description><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Loudat states &#8220;
</p>
<p>
Finally, regardless of what many are saying, everybody in our state already has equal rights when it comes to being married; every citizen in this state, regardless of his or her “sexual orientation,” has the same right as any other citizen to marry a person of the opposite sex.&#8221;  
</p>
<p>
...but that argument is intrinsically flawed on its face. 
</p>
<p>
 What we are talking about is real equality in authentic, loving, comitted same sex relationships and most people are in agreement about that.&nbsp; 
</p>
<p>
If I marry a woman for &#8220;cover&#8221; but carry on with man to man sexual encounters, a la Larry Craig or Mark Foley, it would seem to me that is a fraudulent &#8220;marriage&#8221; and hardly worth holding up as the model for everyone to aspire to just because opposite sexes are involved.
</p>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 10:46:57 CST</pubDate>
    </item>

    
    </channel>
</rss>